Home
Sep 06
2017
4 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
Do you really have to make your films so violent? We went to the cinema last Saturday and every single trailer for new movies was dystopian, explosive, violent, cruel and visually disturbing. There wasn’t a single movie that I would choose to see or that I felt added any value to our lives. But no doubt you will make money from them and your marketing teams will ensure that they are blockbusters. All I ask is do you really want your children to retain these visions as they grow up to become the leaders who will be creating their own, and our, future?
I just wonder how we have become so adapted to Hollywood producing endless brutal films? I was born in 1950 and raised on comedies and romances starring Peter Sellers or Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn. Other than cowboy or war films there was little, if any, violence and Bambi was about as dark as it got. Hitchcock’s thrillers were the first I saw and then we moved into more domestic drama such as The Pumpkin Eater and Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor in Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf. But films like Seven took violence into a totally new genre of sadism, as do digital games such as Grand Theft Auto and others I don’t even want to think about. Killings, torture and sexual cruelty seem to have become the norm.
I remember my dear late Polish brother-in-law Leo commenting that you only get such unpleasant movies when the life around you is reasonably comfortable. Raised in Poland in the war he knew more about life’s real cruelties and barbarity than I did and I can see that if you are actually experiencing violence in your life you are less likely to want to watch more of it. Perhaps it is because we have Kim Jong Un, Putin and Trump arming themselves up for a potential world catastrophe that I felt all the more disgusted by the onslaught of violence I saw in the trailers at the Vue Eastleigh last weekend.
Even children’s stories are no longer the sweet innocent narratives they used to be. If you watched Mary Poppins or the early versions of The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe they are far tamer than recent blockbuster versions of the classics, such as The Jungle Book. Even Paddington Bear became a rather horrifying version about the threatened taxidermy of a small bear. I think my 6-year-old granddaughter has seen more movies in her short life than I had seen by the time I reached adulthood and I am aware that the 3-D aspect of cinematography makes things far more realistic and immediate – which can be wondrous but also terrifying. Recently a writing colleague had her children’s novel, about evacuee children in World War II, rejected by a publisher as “the children in the story were not in enough danger to be of interest to today’s young audience”. Should children be exposed to a continuous ramping-up of adrenalin arousal through increasingly frightening scripts?
The thunderous Dolby surround sound that blasts our ears as the film or ads start is another assault, surely unnecessary and makes us all jump out of our seats. Do you think we are all deaf? Or perhaps you want to make us deaf? The small child in the cinema next to me in The Jungle Book was terrified.
The problem is that the sounds and images linger in the imagination. They acclimatize our minds to violence so that it no longer seems as shocking as it once was. And yet violence is shocking. I look at the state of the world today with its religious and ideological wars and the number of young men excited about taking up arms and I question how we are still, in 2017, determined to kill one another. Now that we realize what a small and vulnerable planet we reside on I would have hoped that we would not still be polluting the environment with bombs, explosions, chemical weapons or acid attacks. And I guess I just don’t appreciate being reminded of all this horror with yet more apocalyptic views of the future dressed up as entertainment.
I have written before of Ekhart Tolle (author of bestsellers A New Earth and The Power of Now) and his concept of a ‘pain body’. This is a part of our emotional make-up that we can unconsciously hook into – the part of us that stops to gawp at a motorway accident, or wants to read about some horrendous murder in the paper. He talks of how newspapers and media-makers play on the pain-body aspect of we fallible humans to draw us towards the negative. But the important message is that once we become aware of what hooks us we have the power to choose not to read, not to watch, not to stop on the motorway. And of course this links to the points I made in my last blog, Let’s Shake Ourselves out of this gloom, https://www.helenwhitten.com/thinking-aloud/lets-shake-ourselves-out-of-this-gloom/ because it is hard to be creative in a way that could be beneficial to human life on earth if we are too steeped in the negativity of the pain-body.
So surely, dear screenwriters, you have the talent and capacity to use your creativity in constructive ways? I am not talking of dumbing down but I am talking about being broader and perhaps deeper in your depiction of life – the film The Intouchables comes to mind as I write. There are endless intricacies and complexities in everyday life that make excellent topics for drama – perhaps you could open your eyes and minds to different descriptions and studies of human behaviour?
The future does not have to be dystopian but if these are the images that are sewn into the neurons of the young people who are watching your movies then perhaps that will be the only image they will be able to conjure up? The power of imagination is immense and the power of unconscious drives equally so. The future of life on earth isn’t looking that rosy right now and personally I don’t feel that your violent movies are contributing towards making life on earth a better place.
No doubt you will say that I am an old fogey and not, in any case, your target audience. You might comment that I am being too soft and sensitive about future generations. But please just give a moment’s thought to the kind of images and stories you wish your own children or grandchildren to be exposed to … and see whether that shifts your thinking when you craft future scripts? I hope so.
Aug 30
2017
4 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
Are you as fed up as I am with the amount of negativity and pessimism that exists in this country? Watching the 10 o’clock news does not make for a happy bedtime. Almost every media report is slanted towards the negative – for example, what the NHS is failing to do rather than the daily miracles they perform. The press have the power to shape our perspectives and beliefs and drama sells newspapers so inevitably stories can be ramped up to catch the public’s attention. Our political leaders reinforce these messages by talking of division and a “broken Britain”. The worst thing is that we end up believing it! We need more balanced perspectives.
This morning we happened to re-read some paragraphs of Napoleon Hill’s Success through Positive Mental Attitude. The passages reminded me how important his message of a positive mental attitude is to happiness, health and success.
Hill’s message also reminded me of an initiative I had wanted to set up way back in 1995 to “Think Positively for Britain” . I don’t know if you remember but the recession of the early 90s had put us in the doldrums and I became aware that we are very good at the doldrums in the UK, that we have a habit of denigrating ourselves and being apologetic for more-or-less everything we do or stand for. And I felt then, as I do now, that such negative messages only lead us into a state of paralysing disempowerment. As I wrote in my report in 1995 “every time we talk negatively about the UK we bolster the image of a failing and disintegrating nation”. Do we really want the rest of the world to see us and respond to us in this way, particularly when Messrs Barnier and Juncker are happy to do this for us?
It seems to me all the more urgent now that we shift ourselves out of this gloom. How can we bring up a confident new generation when the messages that young people receive are that they are in a country that is about to fall off a “cliff-edge”? We need to inspire the young to rise above the negativity and create success despite the very real challenges we face in the world. Positive expectations, when based in realistic possibilities, motivate others to step up. We need our leaders to talk of unity and vision and what each of us can do to help achieve this.
We have a tradition in this country of helping entrepreneurs and supporting small businesses. Start-ups are given tax relief and concessions on VAT until their business is established. In July this year the employment rate (the proportion of people aged from 16 to 64 who are in work) was 74.9%, the highest since comparable records began in 1971. Our youth unemployment figures are 12.3% compared to up to 46% in Greece and many young people in the UK want to, and do, start their own businesses – our tech companies are thriving as are our design, music, fashion, film, life sciences and service industries. That’s pretty good news as far as I am concerned.
We beat ourselves up about everything – Brexit, racism, inequality, poverty, housing, health, education. You name it, we complain about it and of course there are very real improvements to be made in many areas but right now we need people to feel energetic and willing to work hard in order to tackle the challenges of a changing relationship with the world. As Napoleon Hill says, we need to attract success by being the sort of people others want to work with. We have shown ourselves capable of this in the past so there’s no reason why we can’t do it again.
I suggest that we need to review the reality of our tendency to apologise for our existence – they say the Brits say “sorry” even when others have bumped into them (read Watching the English by Kate Fox).
Are we really that much worse a country than others? Yes, there are anti-immigrant groups here but look at the rest of the world – the numbers who voted for Le Pen in France, the far right movements in the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, Austria. All over the world there are many families who do not condone their offspring marrying outside their ethnic or religious community. I am not condoning this but I just question whether we are truly worse than others are? There is an assumption that by the small majority that voted for Brexit it makes us all racists, though certainly not everyone who voted for Brexit was racist nor a Little Englander.
Yes, we have some class issues but the Americans have their Ivy League, the Italians have any number of Counts and Contessas, the French politicians have almost all attended the elite Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and the Indians have their caste system. Yes, we had an Empire but so did the Dutch, French, Chinese, Romans, Spanish, Portuguese and many more. Yes, we have inequality issues of social mobility but believe me it is a very different world to that of my 1950s childhood in terms of opportunity for all. We have a long way to go still but we need to acknowledge the changes that have been made and use them as a springboard. We need to remember, also, that not everyone wants to move upwards – that people have communities of friends, cultural and family networks that feel comfortable to them. I also question whether, while the term “posh” is used as an insult, it encourages people to move up or become wealth creators? People tend to use the term “rich” as a criticism, forgetting that wealth creators can become philanthropists.
I am not condoning the situations that need improvement but my question is to check whether we are really so much worse than others in the way we currently seem to think of ourselves? Our institutions of government, law and social services are not perfect but they match up pretty well to those in other countries. Let’s acknowledge what we have developed over the centuries. It isn’t about comparing ourselves with others necessarily, as comparison doesn’t always work when each country has its own unique circumstances. It is about perspective. Let’s not judge ourselves more harshly than we judge others. It isn’t good for our future, especially in a time of false truths and radicalisation.
The majority of people here live in better circumstances than ever before. We have a reasonably civilised and tolerant society where we strive for equality of the sexes, classes, gender and race, even if we inevitably don’t succeed as much as we would like to. Far more people today have a roof over their head, central heating, fridges, cookers, washing machines, televisions, a mobile phone and cars, than in my childhood. We benefit from a National health service and free education. We can drink the water from the tap and be assured that our sewage system works pretty well most of the time. Having travelled to over 50 countries, I feel we have much to be grateful for and yet we certainly can’t be complacent and need to keep striving for improvements.
My argument isn’t about nationalism or empire building or any political movement. We don’t have to wait for politicians or social services or anyone else in order to be able to start conversations that remind us of the better aspects of life here. We can do it now, for ourselves. We can build up a sense of confidence and worth, a sense of belonging to something good. This focus can make us happier and also improve our health. The Danes may have invented Hygge but surely we have done cosy for generations? We live in a beautiful country made up of a multitude of good people: let us celebrate what we have achieved. We need to believe in ourselves and our ability to create more success through collaboration, despite the challenges. Let’s start describing ourselves as a country in which there is enterprise, achievement and potential.
In my 1995 initiative I suggested that we allocate a time each day, say 8.15am, where we focus on thinking positively about what is working and could work, rather than what is not. I suggested people identify and share just one thing that pleased them about living here – for example, perhaps public libraries, public footpaths, national parks and forests, our immense generosity as a nation when giving to charity, Bake-Off …? Why don’t you name what comes to your mind and do let me know – and if you manage to persuade a journalist to print a positive story I will give the first ten people who do so a copy of my CD on positive thinking!
Refs: https://www.statista.com/statistics/266228/youth-unemployment-rate-in-eu-countries/
Napoleon Hill: Think and Grow Rich; Napoleon Hill and Clement W Stone: Success through Positive Mental Attitude; Napoleon Hill and Dennis Kimbro: Think and Grow Rich: A Black Choice
Kate Fox: Watching the English
Charlotte Abrahams: Hygge: A Celebration of Simple Pleasures. Living the Danish Way.
Positiveworks Ltd is now owned by Sixth Sense Consulting www.sixthsenseconsulting.co.uk
Aug 16
2017
3 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
Last week we went to the funeral of an elderly aunt. She was a feisty lady, well read and well respected. She reminded me a little of my mother. She had two sons, now in middle years, who arranged the funeral beautifully and, as a mother of two sons, it took my imagination forward to the potential moment of my own funeral, with my sons arranging the readings and music for me. This made me wonder what they would choose. It would, perhaps, be controlling of me to leave them a list …?
It is discomforting to accept that I have reached this stage of life. It means I truly have to start thinking of myself as grown up, as of an age when my own parents were getting ill and more vulnerable. I prefer, of course, to think of myself as a svelte, slightly rebellious rather pop-mad teenager but there is no way I can pretend that this is who I am these days – especially when I look in the mirror!
And moving house – when we finally get an offer on our beautiful Hampshire home – brings this all to the foreground of my attention as we have to begin to consider what life might be like for us over the next 10-20 years. A rather unsettling prospect, really. My younger son told me off the other day for talking too much about ageing and legacies (at least it’s good to think he isn’t waiting for that one!) but the reality is that as we look at houses we do absolutely have to consider our needs in the years to come. We certainly don’t want to be giving the government and estate agents the benefit of our cash in exorbitant taxes and fees by having to move again, unless we absolutely have to.
So this involves us thinking about whether we shall have dodgy hips, wobbly ankles, rheumatism or arthritis, will we go a little doollally with dementia, will the staircase be too steep for us, will it (awful thought) fit a Stannah chairlift? Is it close enough (but not too close) to children and grandchildren for us to visit them – and of course for them to reach us in an emergency?
Alongside the possibilities of frailty come the tricky questions of Wills and legacies and Inheritance Tax and how much money one might need, outside the bricks and mortar, to pay for a care home, or care at home, should we need it. And all the more complicated having come together later in life with what they call a ‘blended’ family.
Someone commented to me the other day that we were unusual in wanting to move from the countryside towards London at this stage of life but I responded that my understanding is that this is quite a trend with us Baby Boomer generation. Personally at this and the next stages of life I would much rather have life and cafés and art galleries (not to mention doctors, chemists and hospitals) on my doorstep than cows and sheep. Don’t get me wrong, I love cows and sheep and would make sure to visit them frequently from our urban home. I just don’t find them stimulating enough on a daily basis to keep me feeling young. David and I both enjoy the bustle of an art gallery, the provocation of a lecture, a walk in a park, the escapist enjoyment of a movie or play.
Then there is driving. In the country you have to drive everywhere and living in Alresford, our very pretty Jane Austen-style market town, I notice the elderly drivers, the way they park in the middle of the road, the way they scratch your car as they head for the supermarket or chemist. Although I accept that the young are also a risk, I don’t want to become one of those doddery drivers. They can be dangerous. I prefer to think of getting on a tube, train or bus and letting those ‘take the strain’ as the ad used to say.
Countryside is, in my view, a marvellous place for families with children, where they can run around. It is also a wonderful environment for those in middle years who can, as David and I have, enjoy the beauty and yet feel energetic enough to drive to theatres and museums. We are so fortunate in our little spot of Hampshire to have theatres in Chichester, Guildford and Southampton so easily available, and the Pallant Gallery and Farnham Crafts Museum as well as some of the most beautiful Cathedrals one could ever wish for. It has been great.
But right now I am ready to return to the smoke. I like to think we can get a train for a nice weekend in the countryside or to stay with friends. Also it is surprising how cheap London can be. Wonderful lunchtime concerts in churches, thought-provoking lectures, access to any number of museums all for virtually nothing. Not to mention a Freedom Pass if one is fortunate enough to receive one – and if one has the courage to battle the crowds.
So the flashforwards have forced me to consider the reality of our situation, the aspects of life we may have to plan for in these years to come. We are agreed that in choosing our new home we will take all this into account and ensure that what we buy will support our aspirations. There is much to look forward to but nonetheless a few things to worry about.
And I am afraid, my darling sons, that I have already started to make that list for my funeral – and I do hope you will find it and make sure that you read Wendy Cope’s marvellous poem My Funeral [see http://lastwordcelebrant.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/poem-my-funeral-by-wendy-cope.html ] which is about the importance of keeping a funeral short and not allowing it to be a eulogy. My mother was adamant about this towards the end of her life – “for goodness sake don’t go overboard on the praise, I am fed up with listening to eulogies of my friends that don’t describe them one jot”.
I am ashamed to admit I was reminded of the Wendy Cope poem while listening to The Archers recently (Caroline’s funeral, for those of you similarly hooked). The Archers addiction is, I fear, another sign of age, as I’ve always vowed I would never listen and am now absolutely glued. Oh dear, the slippery slope downhill? I justify it as being 13 minutes of harmless village gossip.
But really it reminds me that I have probably always been a city girl at heart, not truly one interested in the everyday life of heifers and pigs. So am looking forward to our move back towards London when it happens. That particular flashforward makes me excited. And I don’t suppose David will be too sorry to hand the lawn-mowing over to a pair of younger hands either!
Aug 02
2017
2 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
I personally hope we will all turn over from Channel 4 on Thursday evening and not watch the programme on the Princess Diana tapes. It seems to me such an intrusion of privacy and likely to cause hurt and harm to those close to her, namely her sons. We already know that she was a flawed human being but then surely we are all flawed to some extent, aren’t we? Don’t we all make mistakes? Don’t we all, over a lifetime, do the odd thing of which we are not proud? Maybe say something we shouldn’t have said, pass on gossip we should have kept to ourselves, mixed with someone we know we should have kept a distance from? Don’t we all spend a little time of our lives in the wilderness? Would we want our dirty linen aired in public – and especially in front of our children?
Of course she was part of the Royal family and so there are aspects of her life that are in the interests of history but is how often she and Prince Charles had sex really that relevant for future historians? The interest feels like prurience to me.
In my experience, in my own life and in the lives of those with whom I have had the honour of working, we tend to make more mistakes when we are unhappy, or lonely. I think there is plentiful evidence that the moment Diana walked into the Royal family she was isolated and unsupported. Her family life at home was fragmented and so where were her anchors? I don’t find it at all surprising that she looked for love in other places and often in the wrong places.
A key principle of cognitive-behavioural psychology is to accept that we are all fallible. That there is no perfect life, no perfect person, no perfect way of being or living one’s life. The principle is that there are many shades of grey, in life and in people. Rather than black or white judgements we seek to help clients to find perspective and balance, so as to be able to forgive themselves and others and move on with their lives in greater confidence and strength.
There is no hero or heroine alive now or in history who did not have a dark side as well as a light one. Diana inevitably had strengths and touched many people around the world. Perhaps we can also accept that she, like any one of us, had faults but that doesn’t take away any goodness she might have done. It just makes her human.
I was in Venice with my two sons the day she died. They are a couple of years older than William and Harry. The nature of her death shocked us all and, as a mother of sons, seeing the young boys grieve while having to remain public figures was poignant. Their and the Royal family’s confusion at the outpouring of grief was visible and unsurprising. It was an extraordinary response. People were crying, pin-striped suited men carried flowers to Kensington Palace, you couldn’t walk across Kensington Gardens for flowers and candle vigils. I shall never forget the atmosphere in London in those weeks – a silence seemed to take over the City, a stillness. It was a strange feeling that I don’t think can be explained easily other than that something in her death and the bereavement of those boys touched a part of our own grief. These feelings were mirrored across the world.
But her public persona doesn’t give us a right to her private life. Whether you were moved by her or not surely we can respect any human being sufficiently not to want to expose their deepest secrets? She did not make those tapes for publication. William and Harry have already been exposed to Prince Charles’ tapes and the slanging match of divorce. Anyone who has divorced knows that there is a period of time when one tries to justify one’s own position. Most of us wouldn’t want these intimate details to be shared in public and especially not to our children.
Those young men experienced the trauma of losing a mother, a sudden tragic death. Can we not respect and empathise with them enough now to request that Channel 4 not show the programme on Thursday? And if they continue to do so, then simply to switch off?
Jul 28
2017
2 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
I’m not going to pretend I know the reason why women’s salaries are lower than men’s but over the 25 years during which I coached both men and women, and was a woman running a business, I did become aware of some of the trends that would have led to these outcomes still being commonplace. The headlines commenting on the BBC salaries and the apparent inequality of income between its male and female presenters has led me to think again about gender roles, prejudice, unconscious bias and value. It has made me reflect on my own life and the experiences of women my age and younger. It has reminded me what a tricky journey it can be to rise to the top as a woman, when working within what has been a history of a male-dominated environment. So I am going to share a few of those thoughts and as always will be interested in your comments.
Cultural gender legacy
Firstly, it has made me remember the social culture in which I and other older women have grown up. This is not intended in any way as a whinge as I am not one to believe in that. It is intended to help us remember some facts about the environment in which girls grow up.
When I grew up in the 1950s the boys were often treated as if they knew best, even if they didn’t, and this is still the case in some families and cultures. Parents were more lenient with boys in terms of domestic duties. As girls when we went to parties we had to risk being wallflowers, waiting for a boy to ask us to dance. If girls got pregnant they would be shamed while the boys could go off with their honour somehow intact. It gave girls the message that men had more power and can still do so.
At dinner parties in the 60s and 70s men would quite often talk over us, as if we had nothing to say because, after all, they were so important in their working lives that they couldn’t imagine that we had insights they might never have. I grew up with teachers who assumed that I would be a nurse or secretary rather than doctor or boss. In the 60s, when I started work, men were in charge and often asked you to make the tea or coffee for your seniors, whatever your qualifications. It was the rare determined girl who would see herself beyond this, rather than muddling through and then making it to the top despite the put-downs and stereotypes.
As a married women I would receive cold calls to the home where a sales rep would immediately ask to speak to my husband, or say “is Mr Whitten there?” rather than consider that I could be intelligent or responsible enough to make a decision about a purchase myself.
Even in my generation of Baby Boomers I knew some husbands who did not want their wives to work – perhaps because their attention might be called elsewhere than from on them but also due to a potential sense of loss of pride. After all, if their wives were working it might suggest that they themselves were not earning enough to keep their family. That same kind of husband might also spend more money on sending their son to a good private school and not their daughter. Certainly women frequently felt guilty and exhausted by trying to juggle work and family.
It was less than 100 years ago that women got the vote on the same terms as men. It was only in the early 60s that women were able to take control of their bodies and lives through contraception. Throughout history and into the 21st century, wife-beating and domestic violence occurred frequently. These are facts and should not be forgotten. It leads many women to experience being undervalued as a norm in society and especially in the workplace.
All this created the backdrop to the environment in which women of my age grew up. Inevitably this shaped our sense of self identity and esteem. Unfortunately it probably also had an impact on our daughters – we hoped to provide them with a world where there was real equality between the genders but sadly, as the BBC revelations show, things have not changed as much as we had hoped.
I don’t suggest that women should think of themselves as victims. I don’t believe that an identity of victimhood does anyone any good. It certainly doesn’t empower them to make changes.
No, these experiences were what they were. They need to be accepted as historical facts. It was a different world and men felt they had the upper hand . They did and, in many ways, if you look around the world, still do. Many women bought into this too. Our beliefs and opinions are influenced by the norms of the society we grow up in. Our brains are shaped by the messages we receive from parents, teachers, community leaders. We can be duped into thinking something is right when it patently evidently isn’t. Women in other parts of the world and in other cultures can still be treated as having a lesser status than men. Boys are often still brought up to think they are special, more powerful. It is parenting that needs to change, alongside expectations in school and the workplace. We need to bring boys up not to feel intimidated by bright girls so that they don’t feel the need to put them down. We need to show them that to treat women with respect does not make them less of a man. This isn’t a win-lose situation, we are looking for a win-win.
Women’s perception of self
Over my years of running Positiveworks I coached many bright, ambitious and capable women who couldn’t see the point of endlessly promoting themselves or pushing for higher salaries in the way that their male colleagues did. At the same time I noticed a hesitancy, a doubt about whether a woman felt she deserved an increase – not with all women, of course, but with a majority of those I coached. And HR departments report that women only go for a job if they feel they have 100% of the skills required whereas men will go for a job sometimes even if they have only 60% of the necessary skillsets. In my own work I had to constantly adjust my fees if I became aware that male consultants were charging more. I have to admit that thinking about fees was not my top priority.
We need to remember too that in the early part of the 20th century, so not so long ago, women were frequently resented in the workplace. They were accused of taking male jobs. After having contributed much to the war efforts they were nonetheless sent back to the kitchen in the 1950s. Women were forced to resign when they got married. So perhaps it isn’t surprising that when women got jobs they would sometimes feel grateful and not wish to make a fuss or cause trouble by being demanding about pay or promotion.
In surveys women tend to rate themselves as equivalent to co-workers but 70% of men would rate themselves higher. Where a working woman has a family I found that she often felt guilty and was also made to feel guilty by family members such as mothers, aunts, grandmothers, for working alongside parenthood. She could feel stretched, leading to a sense that she wasn’t doing any job well. Even when a woman was the main breadwinner she would often have to be doing the thinking about what was needed in the home. Even though her husband or partner would help, it was her who had to do the planning and take the initiative to address domestic chores and needs. All of which could be tiring alongside a demanding role.
Attitudes and behaviours in the workplace
As late as 2005, when I was running Positiveworks, I remember a call coming through to my male assistant. “I’d like to talk to your Managing Director,” the male caller told him. My PA passed the phone to me and I said “Hello, what can I do for you?” at which the caller said, very irritably, “I asked to talk to your Managing Director!” I asked him “What makes you think you aren’t talking to the Managing Director?” The caller huffed and puffed and said “Well an MD is usually a male”.
I found that a woman would be judged more harshly than a man. In appraisals a man would be rewarded for the success of a team whereas the feedback of a woman would be that she had “great team support”. Sadly also male managers would avoid appraisals all together as they feared an emotional response from a female staff member. They could manage anger, a more male response, it seemed, but they couldn’t manage tears. Therefore they would postpone appraisals and the female employee would therefore not receive the encouragement and development feedback she needed to succeed.
Success criteria has been defined by men and expectations in the workplace and outside have been shaped by social norms. The idea that men make better leaders is historic and bought into by both genders but I hope that now we see Trump as President in the US and think back over the disastrous male dictators of the past we shall alter this perception!
Even now though, in many departments, a sense that the way men do things is the ‘right way’ and so women try to fit in. Although a woman will bring as much skill as a man to a role, the way she does a job or leads a department may be different and sometimes they can feel that this difference means it is the ‘wrong way’ which can lead to a sense of isolation.
Most companies these days promote the concept of diversity. It just doesn’t always result in a willingness to practice the consensual listening skills and discussions that really optimise diverse perspectives in terms of creative problem solving. I believe governments and organisations would benefit from learning to practice this kind of debate more frequently. This idea is backed up by a Catalyst report that showed that mixed-gender boards outperform single-gender boards. However, one token person of the minority gender is not sufficient to influence the group.
There are plenty of excellent women in the BBC and beyond who deserve parity when their skill and experience have been proven equal. I’d like to think of my granddaughters growing up in a world where their sense of themselves is equal to that of their male peers and where their managers acknowledge their achievements. I would like them to accept that their way of working and communicating may be different but is as justified and valuable. For this to happen we need to encourage the view that women may not promote themselves with so much noise but can be every bit as competent and deserve equal status and pay.
Values
I question whether women traditionally have put as much importance on monetary income. I am not convinced that money and status has had the same impact on their sense of value in themselves as it does for some male colleagues. I have noticed that having an interesting, fulfilling and balanced life is often what women seek. Reports demonstrate that women bring a social and ethical sensitivity to the workplace, alongside achieving the qualifications and skillsets that match males.
But women obviously do want to be valued and acknowledged, so there needs to be more understanding from managers and leaders that they deserve to receive equal pay for an equal role. I remember one female manager saying to me that she noticed her male peers demanding large annual increases but she felt she had an extremely good salary and would not have asked for more had they not all been doing so.
My hope for the future
We need women’s voices and perspectives in the world of business and government. We have a long way to go before we have equal numbers of men and women at the top which, in my view, is the ideal balance of energies and perspectives for good leadership of the world. We can’t change the past but we need to realize that there is more work to be done. In today’s world young women are being undermined through body image, sexual objectification through the porn that young boys are watching, and an aggressive macho-boy culture that has built up in some communities and organisations.
So we can’t be complacent. We need to continue to support our daughters, grand-daughters, nieces and great-nieces to feel as powerful as their male peers. We need to encourage them to feel confident and believe they have as much right as others to speak up, to demand equal positions and equal salaries. We still have to question society’s bias.
I’m sorry, I said to a friend this week that I would write shorter blogs – I haven’t succeeded but as you might guess I feel rather strongly about this issue!
Jul 18
2017
5 Responses
Comments
Helen Whitten
Posted In
Tags
Listening to the news, on the Today programme this morning, of squabbling in the government, I began to feel I had woken up inside the Mad Hatter’s Tea Party. Riddles, rudeness and incivility, along with pipe dreams of Treacle Wells post-Brexit, sounded remarkably like the Mad Hatter and the March Hare sparring with Alice in Wonderland. I envisaged Philip Hammond as the Dormouse, finally waking from sleep and speaking up, only for the Mad Hatter and March Hare, in the form of Boris Johnson and David Davis, to plot to stuff him firmly back into his teapot. Perhaps Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell will push them all aside with a cry of “Off with their heads!” Meanwhile, Theresa May, if she is Alice, takes herself off to a garden in Switzerland to escape the posturing.
It made me think about how our future in the UK, and the future of the world, is in the hands of besuited egotistical [1] men, and sometimes women, strutting their stuff. And it makes me anxious. Through history men have operated in hierarchical systems, each vying to be top dog and fighting those who challenge them. It’s a win-lose game rather than a win-win game. The stability of the world and its trade rests in their hands but narcissistic [2] leaders can and have caused havoc and worse in the past.
Some humility would be helpful right now, I think. Some indication that our leaders are seeking ways to work together for the good of the world would be comforting. But when I look at the reports of the negotiations in Brussels, or the latest news from Washington, Moscow, Paris, Hungary, Poland, the Philippines, North Korea or Turkey I don’t see much sign of it. And it makes me remember the March Hare yawning and saying “Suppose we change the subject…I’m getting tired of this” . And I feel like burying my head in the sand . Certainly I find myself sleeping much better when I don’t watch the late night news.
Are those in charge thinking about their own position, pride, career and agenda or are they thinking what is best for the world? Are they holding a focus on the needs of those millions of people they represent or are they just hungry for power? Who can tell whether they all say what they mean or mean what they say?
Ego is an interesting drive one has to learn to manage. Too little of it and one limits one’s life and what one might contribute creatively in the world. Too much of it and it can do untold damage.
In the book Where Egos Dare, the Untold Truth about Narcissistic Leaders and how to Survive Them by Dean B McFarlin and Paul D Sweeney (Kogan Page, 2002), they define a narcissistic leader as having the following characteristics:
- Reliance on manipulation and exploitation
- Impulsive and unconventional behaviour
- Excessive impression management
- Poor administrative practices
- Inability to recognize a flawed vision
- Failure to plan for succession
I am sure we have all met at least one narcissist in our own lives, and witnessed the damage they can cause to an individual, organisation or nations. I find it extraordinary and disillusioning to realize that, having got this far through history and seen what such a leader can inflict on others, we have not yet found a way to prevent them pushing their way to the top. Is it wilful blindness or fear that inhibits peer groups of politicians and employees from standing up to the ruthlessness that characterises the way such people rise to positions of power?
So far, the threat posed by today’s rulers has been managed enough to prevent nuclear holocaust, though Kim Jong Un is intent on frightening those close to the borders of North Korea. The problem is, as we can see with Donald Trump, that when one challenges them one can get hurt. They are not easy to manage. Rages, tirades and tantrums are part of the arsenal of an egotistical leader. Divide and rule is a common behavioural response. Sacking or alienating those who criticise them or do not agree with their policies gradually ensures that they are surrounded by sycophants.
I think that the institutions of government in the UK will hopefully protect us from a dictatorship or authoritarian leader. I am less optimistic about other parts of the world.
And of course we all need to reflect, too, on our own ego and how we manage it. In my work as a coach I found that the majority of those I worked with were battling self-doubt and needed to bolster their self-confidence rather than damp it down. Some philosophers and psychologists state that the ego is always a destructive force but personally I think each of us needs enough of a sense of ourselves to have the courage and confidence to make the most of ourselves, to express ourselves, to innovate and break through outmoded practices or create something new.
I find that people in the UK have traditionally been nervous of sharing their successes. Teachers at school drum into us not to show off or bully and this follows through into adults who fear it is arrogant to tell others what they have achieved. But, as ever, it is about balance. You can surely talk of an achievement, and how you attained your goal, with modesty rather than boasting, and by doing so help others learn ways to achieve their own goals.
It is when someone brags and puts others down, insisting on higher status and rejecting any critical feedback that one realizes that such a person might benefit from being made aware how their behaviours impact others. In the cases when I have worked with an egotistical person, male or female, I concluded that they had little understanding of the feelings of others. Indeed sometimes they did not care about others but at other times they found it difficult to put themselves in the shoes of those with whom they related. Role-play exercises encouraging them to be at the receiving end of the behaviours they were meting out brought some insight. Sometimes this worked to change their behaviour; other times the me-first behaviours were too entrenched to alter.
Looking back on my own life, I have, like all of us, learnt some valuable lessons about keeping my sense of self strong enough to be confident but not so strong as to be boastful. I am conscious of the continuing need to be watchful of egotistical tendencies. I became aware of having to manage my ego when I was running Positiveworks as I had to bolster myself up to stand up in front of successful professional people and imagine I could teach them a skill or help them develop. I remember some excellent advice that I was given early in this career, when I mentioned a concern about whether I looked stupid, my hair looked a mess, or I wasn’t wearing the right business outfit during a training course. My mentor firmly reminded me “it’s not about you! It’s about the message you have to give.” Brilliantly enough, this not only helped me move away from any narcissistic preoccupation but it also helped calm my nerves, as if you are focusing on the message you have no time for feeling anxious about how you are delivering it!
There’s another adjustment of ego I am finding, that happens when one retires. A “who am I now?” moment – no longer a Managing Director, or a lawyer or doctor – and a moment to reflect on what this means in terms of identity. Just a man or woman, a mother or father perhaps, a friend, a sibling, maybe a grandparent. The status and position removed. And so how does the ego adjust? Often, I think, with some difficulty. It seems to me a time to return to oneself without ego where possible, to accept one’s place in life and allow the younger ones to make the world their own but to share any words of experience or wisdom one might have gleaned over the years. It’s probably my ego that’s writing this piece … And right now I am looking forward to reading Alice in Wonderland to my granddaughter rather than watching the shenanigans being played out in the House of Commons.
- The prefix ego refers to a person’s sense of self, or self-importance. To be egotistical is to have an inflated view of your self-importance — basically to think you’re better than everyone else. You might express this egotism by constantly reminding your friends that you have a fantastic figure or a magnificent mind.
- Narcissism: having or showing an excessive interest in or admiration of oneself and one’s image and physical appearance.